[address-policy-wg] 80% rule, based on feedback from the NCC RS department
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 80% rule, based on feedback from the NCC RS department
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 80% rule, based on feedback from the NCC RS department
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Wed Apr 7 14:42:31 CEST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > seem relevant to consider 'one LIR' vs 'lots of LIRs'. In extremis, someone > starting 100 LIRs to gain a commercial advantage is clearly not a desirable > situation. Also agree, but on this paragraph feel I must state that we don't have a good framework to my knowledge which allows multiple LIRs to be considered together for policy purposes (controlled by same entity or not) so have to accept that best we can do here is to apply on a per-LIR basis. Dave. - -- - ------------------------------------------------ David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Limited http://www.clara.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAku8fbcACgkQtFWeqpgEZrJbtgCgyYKGrLxOTON1oQsflae6kk5g j08AnAhKy/bZwpzuWcTzZsPYJtKqoD87 =w9Ov -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 80% rule, based on feedback from the NCC RS department
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 80% rule, based on feedback from the NCC RS department
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]