[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Thu Apr 1 14:53:38 CEST 2010
On 01/04/2010 13:36, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Number: 2010-01 > Policy Proposal Name: Revoke and Re-assign Fairly > The RIPE NCC will allocate 640 IPv4 addresses to each LIR, because that > that should be more than enough for anyone. PI assignments requests will > be greeted with even more giggles than they currently are. Why 640, surely an allocation on a bit boundry would be more suitable? The fact that many people get stuck with CIDR addressing I would like to see that the first allocation be made on the /24 boundry. Organisations required a second (or maybe even a third) could always apply for one *after* all the other existing LIRs have completed their requests. J -- James Blessing http://www.despres.co.uk/ 07989 039 476 Superbia in Proelio
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]