[address-policy-wg] ripe471 - language query
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Decision regarding 2009-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-07 Proposal Accepted (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Fri Sep 25 12:47:26 CEST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just a quick query w.r.t the ripe471 document relating to a conversation I had with another registry today who were confused by the use of the language: Section 5.3 (Additional Allocations) states: "An LIR may receive an additional allocation when about eighty percent (80%) of all the address space currently allocated to it is used in valid assignments or sub-allocations." Whereas Section 5.4 (Sub Allocations) states: "LIRs are still required to demonstrate about 80% usage for all their allocations." The question is therefore, do we mean: - - That all the address space currently allocated to the registry should be summed and if the registry consumes more than 80% of this they qualify for an additional allocation or - - That all allocations the registry has must each consume more than 80% before the registry qualifies for an additional allocation. and if so, could the language in the document be cleaned up to avoid such ambiguity? Dave. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkq8n74ACgkQtFWeqpgEZrL9tgCfUbDNmABC8AfnJ4YU/Rd1waU0 Ga8Anjd3WAb1cuyQ/xvd0LH9Z9ZAFilo =q7Pd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Decision regarding 2009-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-07 Proposal Accepted (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]