[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
niels=apwg at bakker.net
niels=apwg at bakker.net
Thu Sep 17 19:38:06 CEST 2009
>> Agree for as long as there are addresses enough to meet the applicants >> needs. Yet it is IMHO pointless to hand out micro-blocks as a sorry >> response to a PA-request for a substantially larger block. * michael.dillon at bt.com (michael.dillon at bt.com) [Thu 17 Sep 2009, 17:13 CEST]: >In particular, what if the applicant's competitor just received a much >larger allocation two weeks earlier? Same thing that happens when the person in front of you in the line at the cafetaria at work takes that last cupcake: you're outta luck. This is also why nobody has proposed to go back and yank valid assignments, no matter if they are two weeks or two decades old. -- Niels.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]