[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Sep 15 09:48:37 CEST 2009
Hi Leo, >> We are talking about PA prefixes here, and this pool is only meant for >> initial allocations (PA), not PI. > > I know. Ok :) >> True. There might be organizations that become an LIR to get that >> initial /24 allocation. > > Has any work been done to identify what proportion of those organizations > that are normally satisfied with PI or PA assignments are likely to go for > a /24 PA "allocation" if that's all there is? I think some data > identifying likely outcomes would be useful when making deciding on the > prefix length to reserve. Hmmm. This is difficult. I don't think any of us has a crystal ball of that quality. My guess is that the only thing we can do is to reserve more addresses (a /10?) now. We can always decide to 'release' them later if it turns out that we reserved too many. Thanks, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]