[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
marc.neuckens at belgacom.be
marc.neuckens at belgacom.be
Mon Sep 14 17:00:28 CEST 2009
Michiel, I support this proposal. * Simple * Deterministic * Very little impact on final date for existing LIR (8 days earlier if we take the 2008 IPv4 address consumption in RIPE) * Reduced impact on routing table size (+ fixed prefix length) * Easy for RIPE NCC to implement. Question : what about PI ? Marc Neuckens Belgacom > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg- > admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Michiel Klaver > Sent: 14 September 2009 15:16 > To: Sander Steffann; address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2 > > Sander Steffann wrote: > > Hi Michiel, > > > >> I would suggest we wait until we hit the final /12 and assign those > >> addresses as fixed /24 blocks only. Big enough for new entrants to setup > >> their IPv4 network and communicate with the 'legacy' internet of today. > >> Too small for the rest of us and force everyone to dive into the deep > >> with IPv6. > > > > If I understand you correctly this would be something like proposed in > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy- > wg/2009/msg00720.html, > > with a reserved /12 for initial allocations of a fixed /24 size. > > > > Or do you mean something different? > > > > Thanks, > > Sander > > > > > > > Hi Sander, > > that indeed is the same, except for the size of the reserved > assignments. With a /12 divided into fixed /24 prefixes you will create > a pool of 4096 available /24 blocks. Given the current RIPE LIR member > count of 5000+ and still growing, that amount of 4096 /24 blocks should > be sufficient for a number of years. > > > With kind regards, > > Michiel Klaver > IT Professional **** DISCLAIMER **** http://www.belgacom.be/maildisclaimer
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]