[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Sep 14 15:03:23 CEST 2009
Hi Michiel, > I would suggest we wait until we hit the final /12 and assign those > addresses as fixed /24 blocks only. Big enough for new entrants to setup > their IPv4 network and communicate with the 'legacy' internet of today. > Too small for the rest of us and force everyone to dive into the deep > with IPv6. If I understand you correctly this would be something like proposed in http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2009/msg00720.html, with a reserved /12 for initial allocations of a fixed /24 size. Or do you mean something different? Thanks, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]