This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Oct 21 20:47:47 CEST 2009
On Oct 21, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Max Tulyev wrote: > Hello Mark, > > I'm not against RIPE decision now, I'm against drop down ten > businesses > down just because one man thought that "it seems" something for him. > > Each such business-critical case should be pedantic investigated by a > group of authoritative people, if not a court. No way any "it > seems..."! > > While Dutch Court process a case (it is not a hours or days, much > more I > think) clients will went away, isn't it? Well depends, let's assume you find yourself a lawyer and go to court: - judge points you back to arbitration in 5 minutes - judge decides other wise: - reclaims the addresses This simply creates the big and feared red button all those film and record companies are hoping for, any case of copyright infringment within the RIPE region has a real good chance of ending up in Dutch court to reclaim the IPs. Wether this actually will stop routing is not important, it's because they can. - he dedcides you can keep the addresses. Oh great, if a request is turned down by a hostmaster I can now go to court and fight over that last /8. Now there is a fair chance that both decissions are appealed for and then again and again, which will take years and years and wil bring significant cost to the NCC, which in the end has to be paid by the members, that's you, me and approx 6000 others. It will be a strange situation that while you fight them, technically you pay the lawyers on both sides :) In the meantime what that judge in his internal wisdom has done, is proclaim himself to boss of the internet, IANA can go and further assigments are done by the joined Dutch judges in which case I think the Dutch government has someting to explain to the rest of the world. And yes I have been in court cases about IP addresses and yes you can forget about a judge actually understanding the mechanisms at work and make a sensible judgement inline with what was internationally agreed on. Taking this to court will make everybody cry, one way or another there is a fair chance we will end with nothing but loosers and a huge bill to pay. I can understand you are pissed off, I would be too if I recieved such a letter. Let it cool down for a bit, count to ten and tomorrow try and contact a hostmaster or IPRA as they are called these days to explain what happened here and see if you can work out how to correct this following the regular processes. If this fails please try arbitration first before going to court, the procedure is there and is very clear and you save the community from a hell of a headache and the membership from a huge bill. MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]