[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Fri Nov 27 19:36:33 CET 2009
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Rémi Després wrote: > No hard feelings, but I felt this needed to be said. There is nothing wrong with 6RD in principle, it's when people map the entire IPv4 space into IPv6 blindly and then use a small fraction of it that it becomes wasteful. I don't have a problem with ISPs will millions of subscribers getting a /24, I have a problem when "every" mom and pop ISP with an AS number is getting a /24 because they want to run 6RD. As long as the policy incurs that you need to have a certain amount of customers to warrant running 6RD using all of IPv4 space and thus needing /24 or /28, otherwise you'd better map a smaller part of it and then you'll be able to fit it just fine into your /32 most likely. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]