[address-policy-wg] Re: 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Fri May 29 22:27:15 CEST 2009
Hi Jeroen, Jeroen Massar wrote: [...] > To twist this in another way: could there be added a requirement that > prefixes are properly registered in RPSL? That would help ISPs decide > which prefixes should be there and how to filter, with maybe having > exclusions. Thanks for bringing this idea forward (again) :-) > Greets, > Jeroen I doubt that a formal policy to require (reasonably complete and detailed) documentation of routing policies amongst ASes will reach consensus, but I'd love to see it tried once again :-) Any such attempt would probably be best made in the framework of the Routing-WG. Wilfried. PS: btw. even if adopted in a region, it would only make real sense if adopted on a global scale and within the framework of a global(ly integrated) IRR. Dreams....
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]