[address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Fri May 29 22:09:05 CEST 2009
Vladislav, I have to strongly disagree with your assertions. poty at iiat.ru wrote: > Nick, just because there is the word "private". > Why should RIPE or some other organization (including mine) provide the > registration and supporting service (for example - uniqueness) for PRIVATE > networks? First of all, RIPE is the Community, the RIPE NCC is executing the policies and providing e.g. the Registration Services. Every organsiation obtaining services, e.g. an IP-Address Assignment or an Allocation are contributing to offset the expenses; either directly or by way of an existing LIR. > If a company wants to use interconnection with other companies - > it is their PRIVATE deal. And they should use their PRIVATE means for > achieving that! The TCP/IP Technology (including the resources to uniquely identify the individual components) are - and indeed should continue to be - accessible to the full community. Whether using this stuff on the "Internet" or for some other purpose is not a discriminating factor here. > Vladislav Potapov > Ru.iiat PS: we have already seen the disadvantage of liberally applying RFC1918, i.e. non-unique, addressing in organisations that eventually were (forced to) connecting to other organisations....
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]