[address-policy-wg] RE: RIPE policies and routing
- Previous message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri May 29 11:52:11 CEST 2009
Hello Dave, >>I observe that RIPE policies can and do dictate routing requirements. >>Further, routing and address allocation are linked. Changing one will >>affect the other > > It is quite common for policy to dictate one thing, but the operator > community to do the other, > address-policy appears to be being steered somewhat by the operator > community now > (see 2006-05 for instance), perhaps we need some synchronisation with > routing-wg here? The proposer of 2009-06 is one of the chairs of the routing-wg :) Sander
- Previous message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]