[address-policy-wg] Anycasting for TLDs and ENUM
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Anycasting for TLDs and ENUM
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals (2008-06 and 2009-04)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Mon Jun 22 14:52:20 CEST 2009
Jim Reid wrote: > To get back to the anycast allocation provisions, the new policy says > these allocations are for DNS service for TLDs and ENUM Tier-1 > delegations. So if the holders of these blocks used them for other > things, they'd presumably be in violation of that policy. For essential services, it's fine to allocate an entire /24 or /16 for an anycast address that there is no point to have address blocks for multiple anycast addresses. Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Anycasting for TLDs and ENUM
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals (2008-06 and 2009-04)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]