[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Mon Jun 22 13:11:12 CEST 2009
* Jim Reid: > It is. Compare and contrast the effort needed to setup DLV (and make > it work) on a DNS server with that needed for an ENUM lookup. Now do > the same thing for on-going maintenance and administration of both > technologies. Why this discussion has popped up in address-policy-wg > and not dns-wg is "interesting".... You claimed that ENUM is a critical service and therefore deserves special treatment as far as addressing policy is concerned. I think this is just wishful thinking. ENUM (in the public e164.arpa tree) hasn't got a significant user base. Certainly, it's not critical Internet infrastructure, and so it doesn't need special treatment for address allocation. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]