[address-policy-wg] 2009-08
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Mon Jun 8 22:04:59 CEST 2009
Can I just ask for clarification of the following: "the LIR must demonstrate the unique routing requirements for the PI assignment." and "The LIR must return the IPv6 PI assignment within a period of six months should the unique routing requirements for the PI assignment no longer be met." 1. does this mean that the following question from RIPE-468 is no longer valid for routing? "% Is the End User requesting extra address space for routing and/or % administrative reasons? (Yes/No)" 2. Will this include the space not being routed at all? or does this require that the space be routed? Regards, Dave. ------------------------------------------------ David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Limited http://www.clara.net -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net on behalf of Frederic Sent: Mon 6/8/2009 20:07 To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2009-08 hi, we support this proposal. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-08.html bst regards. Frederic -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090608/a7229a37/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]