This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 Discussion Period extended until 1 July 2009 (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Jun 1 15:53:56 CEST 2009
but how do you know that? peering is hop by hop. you can only announce to your peers. you have zero control over who they talk to or how they forward on reachability to your prefix roughly speaking, once packets cross my policy boundary (BGP?) then for all intents, I'm on the Internet... even if your prefixes aren't visible on/in my part of the universe. --bill On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 05:32:06PM +0400, poty at iiat.ru wrote: > As already mentioned - to the shared network - the Internet. Opposing > the internal network - how big and ugly it might be! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com > > [mailto:bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com] > > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:12 PM > > To: Potapov Vladislav > > Cc: michael.dillon at bt.com; address-policy-wg at ripe.net > > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and > > IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled] > > > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:24:52PM +0400, poty at iiat.ru wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Is Network X on the Internet? Is the Radianz network on the > > > > Internet? > > > There is a simple answer. If your address block is interacting with > > at > > > least one announced prefix, then you should have globally unique > > > addresses, otherwise - not. > > > > > > > announced to whom? > > > > --bill > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 Discussion Period extended until 1 July 2009 (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]