[address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
poty at iiat.ru
poty at iiat.ru
Mon Jun 1 12:17:13 CEST 2009
Yes, Wilfried, interesting, but it seems that YOU are behind the reality, not mine. > -----Original Message----- > From: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet [mailto:Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at] > Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 12:51 AM > To: Potapov Vladislav > Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and > IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled] > > poty at iiat.ru wrote: > > > IPv4 exists most of it's time without RIR at all. So it's not prove > > anything. > > May I suggest that you read up on reality, in particular the period > of substantial growth and wide-spread penetration? > > > Other consideration is only philosophy, not policy. > > Interesting... > My feeling is that we should go back to real-life issues. > > Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]