[address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Tue Jul 28 14:50:21 CEST 2009
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:30:41AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:29:19PM +0200, Per Heldal wrote: > > Market regulators (national and international) should define the > > requirements and make it mandatory for ISPs to ease the transition from > > an address-block to another, prevent DNS hostage-taking etc. It's very > > similar to what's already done to provide number portability in mobile > > markets. > > Be careful with your wishes. "IP number portability", prescribed by the > regulation authorities, would be the end of the Internet routing as we > know it. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG of course internet routing as we know it is doomed anyway, so why not do number portability? --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]