This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] New RIPE NCC Procedural Document Available
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] New RIPE NCC Procedural Document Available
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Spectrum and IP address reservations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Jul 27 16:10:55 CEST 2009
Hi Mark and Michiel, > They could first try to receive a response by email. If they don't get > that response (and a response that is not from a human person isn't good > enough) they could send the papers by postal mail. This way they could try > to reduce the costs for the contact. > > It also depends on when the resources where given to the > person/organization using it. Rules regarding emails and legal binding are > changing. I think this is more RIPE NCC operational related than address policy related. I don't think cross-posting between ncc-services and address-policy is useful for this discussion. Thanks, Sander Steffann APWG co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] New RIPE NCC Procedural Document Available
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Spectrum and IP address reservations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]