[address-policy-wg] RE: The price of address space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: The price of address space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: The price of address space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Fri Jul 24 10:10:47 CEST 2009
[I wonder where the policy discussion went....] [also, please fix your mailer, 200 column lines don't fit on most peoples displays...] trejrco at gmail.com wrote: > That doesn't answer what you believe about all those deploying v6, for > whatever reasons they are deploying it ... (Reasons that vary from environment to environment) > > > If you want me to start listing the technical merits of IPv6 I would first > point you to a plethora of sources - working groups, RFCs, whitepapers, new > product lines and modes of communication, etc. - are you really asking for > a single email to encompass 10+ years of work by hundreds+ people? Yes, please, please point me to all that information, because there are not so many 'merits', especially technical. And if you claim there are then either I am missing something really big, or you are just preaching what you don't understand. Try coming up with 5 one-liner points where IPv6 > IPv4. I'll give you the sole real merit: More address space. For the rest, there are not any that are significant, as they all can be done with IPv4. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090724/4a0cd20a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: The price of address space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: The price of address space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]