[address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Fri Jul 17 05:51:36 CEST 2009
TJ wrote: > "IPv6 will not be deployed soon" > > Brusque manner aside, I would be curious to know how you define "deployed". > Is it alive, in production networks today? Yes. > Are there _many_ organizations moving towards that goal? Yes. A problem is that the answers have been "Yes." for these 10 years. > encourage the yet-more-widespread use of a previous failing (loss of > addresses as meaningful, unique identifiers)? Problem of NAT is not there. Remembering a raw IPv4 address and a port number is human, while remembering a raw IPv6 address is divine, which may be the true reason why IPv6 is not really deployed at all. :-) Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]