[address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Thu Jul 16 18:02:54 CEST 2009
Jeroen Wunnink wrote: > In the current IPv4 address policy, routability on the internet is not a > factor that is allowed to be taken into account when a PI space is > requested. Yet anything smaller then a /24 is pretty much useless since > most providers filter anything below /24 out. I think minimum PA allocation should, instead, be /24. Then, ISPs assigning /26 (or /28, maybe) to their customers will start actively exchanging /26. Of course, the number of routing table entries will further explode, but it will so with IPv6. Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]