[address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Thu Jul 16 16:26:32 CEST 2009
* Gert Doering: > Given that all currently available operating systems fully support IPv6, Nit: "Full support" is neither generally available nor necessary. IPv6 support levels are typically sufficient, although usually not RFC-conforming (just like IPv4, where we've learnt not to enable certain protocol features). > and none of them support the modifications necessary to "help the NAT > gateway", I can't see how this would be a step forward. > > But this is far out of scope for RIPE APWG anyway Is it? RIPE could promote 6to4 adoption (similary to what is done for ENUM). Perhaps it's more of a topic for the IPv6 WG, but I don't think this is IETF or ICANN material. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]