[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Wed Jul 15 11:45:47 CEST 2009
Stream Service || Mark Scholten wrote: > I didn't say they don't qualify in the current policy. I asked IF they > qualify yet or not. This is because some people say yes they qualify and > some others say they don't qualify. IM[...]HO, as long as this uncertainty exists, which is an uncertainty as to whether there is a problem, it will be impossible to make a convincing case for a policy proposal, for the simple reason that any such proposal would not address a known problem. You say that "some people say" one thing or another. You can test what the current policy allows by making a request through your chosen LIR to the RIPE NCC. Then, when you have an answer and (in case of refusal) an explanation, you'll be in a position to state any problem that you believe exists. IHTH VBR, mvg, etc, Niall O'Reilly
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]