[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon Jul 13 18:24:34 CEST 2009
On 13/07/2009 9:05, "Stream Service || Mark Scholten" <mark at streamservice.nl> wrote: > Hello, > > We are not a LIR and currently there is also no plan at this moment to > become a LIR in the near future. I mainly want to know if it is allowed, if > it is not allowed we will not give clients IPv6 space and if they want it we > forward them to also request an IPv6 PI range. The policy governing IPv6 PI assignments is published here: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-472.html#_8._IPv6_Provider Other than not being an LIR, you need to demonstrate that you will be multi-homed and able to sign the contract. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]