This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon Jul 13 18:24:34 CEST 2009
On 13/07/2009 9:05, "Stream Service || Mark Scholten" <mark at streamservice.nl> wrote: > Hello, > > We are not a LIR and currently there is also no plan at this moment to > become a LIR in the near future. I mainly want to know if it is allowed, if > it is not allowed we will not give clients IPv6 space and if they want it we > forward them to also request an IPv6 PI range. The policy governing IPv6 PI assignments is published here: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-472.html#_8._IPv6_Provider Other than not being an LIR, you need to demonstrate that you will be multi-homed and able to sign the contract. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]