[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Le Heux
alexlh at ripe.net
Fri Jul 10 10:11:56 CEST 2009
Dear Per, On Jul 9, 2009, at 17:41, Per Heldal wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 16:43 +0200, Alex Le Heux wrote: > >> IPv4 PI Number of assignments >> >> size 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 >> /16 0 0 1 0 0 2 >> /17 2 0 1 1 0 0 >> /18 3 1 2 3 10 2 >> /19 12 3 7 4 12 10 >> /20 23 25 28 23 44 23 >> /21 54 51 56 89 100 52 >> /22 236 260 260 260 399 192 >> /23 359 384 463 776 571 244 >> /24 551 724 895 972 1046 440 >> /25 11 9 22 8 8 6 >> /26 7 7 6 0 5 1 >> /27 7 4 8 8 7 2 >> /28 0 0 8 0 1 0 >> /29 0 2 1 0 8 0 >> total 1265 1470 1758 2151 2211 974 >> > > Do you have the data to split these numbers across two tables, one > with > 1st assignment to new registrants and one with extensions? As this table concerns PI space, the vast majority of holders have only a single assignment. Therefore almost all of these concern new registrants. Best regards, Alex Le Heux RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]