[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Wed Jul 8 15:46:36 CEST 2009
Gert Doering wrote: > Please stick to the topic of *this* discussion. Even with reclamation > efforts, eventually we will reach the last /8, Why? Assuming reduction of address space consumption by mandating NAT, I can't understand how the last /8 could be reached before IPv4 will be replaced by something not likely to be IPv6. Could you elaborate? > and *this* discussion is > only covering the rules for the last /8. I don't think it off topic to discuss whether there will be the last /8 or not. It is a fair counter argument against a policy proposal on the last /8 to say there won't be the last /8. Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]