[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Tue Jul 7 05:25:28 CEST 2009

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:33:35AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> perhaps it is my bad memory, but i have not heard anyone say that
> transfer will be particularly fair. 
> 
> randy

	i suspect that for a valid transfer, both (presuming only two,
	for the purposes of this discussion) parties will consider it
	fair.  no doubt there will be some other party who finds the 
	situation intolerable and will involke the Robert Mugabe-like
	policies of exapropriation in the name of universal good.

	fairness is often in the eye/routing table/wallet of the beholder.

--bill

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ address-policy-wg Archives ]