[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Mon Jul 6 18:26:38 CEST 2009
Any evidence that v4 addresses in /24 quantity have traded for such sums? Milton Mueller Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology ------------------------------ Internet Governance Project: http://internetgovernance.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Marco Hogewoning [mailto:marcoh at marcoh.net] > Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:47 AM > To: Milton L Mueller > Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2 > > > On Jul 5, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> > >> I think it is important to think about new companies. They > will very > >> probably require some IPv4 address space during the transition from > >> IPv4 to IPv6. I think the whole community will be in a lot > of trouble > >> if we make a policy that makes it impossible for new entrants to > >> participate in a dual-stack world. > >> > > > > A legitimate concern. But: > > > > 1. address transfers might make it possible for them to acquire v4 > > addresses > > Transfers from whom ? The /24 they are going to get for > 1,000,000,000,000,000 dollar from an "old company" ? > > MarcoH > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]