[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Jul 7 01:33:35 CEST 2009
>>> Transfers from whom ? The /24 they are going to get for >>> 1,000,000,000,000,000 dollar from an "old company" ? >> is this the arin list ... > Let me be more clear. I personally don't think address transfers will > save the world, sharing is difficult for most people, let alone if the > resource in question is getting more and more scarce. i doubt many people think transfers will save the ipv4 internet, let alone the world. imiho, they are a small thing that can be done to make dealing with the self-inflited disaster a bit more flexible. and making them easy and open will improve the quality of our registration data. > Maybe it's just me, but transfers with or without money will probably > not meet any of the fairness requirements we might come up with and I > do think for the sake of it all we might want to try and keep it a > level playing field as long as we can to prevent the worst case > scenario of a netsplit. perhaps it is my bad memory, but i have not heard anyone say that transfer will be particularly fair. i believe the proposals under discussion are meant to address that. i was particularly objection to your hyperbole on the likely price of a /24. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]