[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Jul 7 00:53:45 CEST 2009
On 06/07/2009 23:41, Randy Bush wrote: > is this the arin list, which is all about fantasy, black helicopters, > and bullshit? No, this is the european list and we're all frightfully sensible over here. Not a single black helicopter in sight. Must be something they put in the water. I ought to inject content at this point, but the topic is perilously close to a committee discussion on potential future deck-chair arrangements. So, instead I'd like to give a "me too" to Peter Koch's contribution: On 05/07/2009 17:56, Peter Koch wrote: > before diving into these or before selecting different options, shouldn't > the overall goals of, say, "fairness" and "sustainability" be broken down > into a tangible set of criteria against which the solutions could be evaluated? > This would also ease the assessment of potential subversion tactics. We have already asked the important question "what are we trying to do?", to which "find a fair solution for doling out the last /8". As Peter and others have suggested, we cannot hope to find this "fairness" ideal unless we have a yardstick with which to measure it. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]