[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Mon Jul 6 00:22:36 CEST 2009
Andreas and all, I agree, the one-size-fits-all approach is a fools errand. Andreas Schachtner wrote: > Hello, > > > The next question is about the amount of addresses someone can get > > from the Final /8. I think we have a number of options here: > > a) Everyone gets one (and only one) fixed size block, as described in > > 2008-06 > > IMHO, the "one size fits all" approach doesn't seem the right way to go. The > rationale in the original proposal was clearly directed towards IPv6 > deployment and maintaining interconnection to the IPv4 world in this szenario. > Even if I think, this is a sensible approach, we agreed 100%, that we don't > want IPv6 related requirements in this proposal (and let me add, neither > explicit nor implicit). > > > b) All requests are downscaled by a certain factor, as described in > > 2009-04 > > This sounds sensible to me. A downsscaling factor of 64 will give enough > address space to stay in the allocation business for some (small "some) years. > > Newcomers are not discriminated, as it seems easier to me for a newcomer to > deploy multiplexing techniques than for an established operator with a large > legacy network. So the goal to keep newcomers in the game is achieved as well > (and reinforced by the proposed argument (d) below). > > > c) We place a limit on the amount of addresses that can be requested > > per time slot (year?) > > and/or > > (d) upon further allocation requests, the LIR has to demonstrate IP use under > the downscaling paradigm (e.g., some kind of multiplexing technology is > deployed for the last allocation). > > Regards, > Andreas > -- > > -- > Andreas Schachtner > > afs Holding GmbH > communication technologies & solutions > http://afs-com.de/ > > Geschaeftsfuehrer Andreas Schachtner > HRB 15448, Amtsgericht Dortmund > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]