[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon Feb 23 21:24:41 CET 2009
Andy Davidson wrote: > Hi, > > A customer has indicated to me that they want PI space for a business > or project that is not incorporated. Under the new 2007-01 rules, what > is the correct way to request PI? > > In UK law, a business might not be incorporated, My take on that one is that the applicant doesn't even have to be a "business". IP technology is agnostic to particular legal models and shapes - at least it should be. > but in such > circumstances, the income and actions of the business are treated as > the income and actions of the principal person behind the business. In > such circumstances does this mean the individual should apply for PI? In our neck of the wooods anyone is able to sign a contract, even as an individual. I don't see any reason why this should not be possible with the NCC? > Previously I'd have advised to use the trading name to apply for PI, > but under new rules I am aware that PI holders need to be able to sign > contracts... The trading name might not be a legal entity able or > willing to sign. > > They plan to multihome, their need for PI appears justified to me. > > Andy Wilfried
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]