This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Tue Feb 10 14:18:35 CET 2009
On 10 feb 2009, at 13:47, Gert Doering wrote:
> What you ("you" as in "the community") now need to make up your mind
> about
> is:
>
> - do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0,
> and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on
> (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it).
>
> - do you want to adapt 2006-01, which means "at least one extra round
> of discussion/review phase".
Let me voice support for 'move on as is' and discuss any changes to it
in a new proposal. This whole PI thing has been on hold for too long.
Groet,
MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]