[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eliot Lear
lear at cisco.com
Tue Feb 10 10:20:25 CET 2009
Isn't space allocated to an LIR PA by definition? Eliot On 2/10/09 9:12 AM, IP-Office KPN wrote: > All, > > I might have missed some of the discussion and emails - in that case my > sincere apologies -, but I couldn't find the answer in my archive, so > here's my question: > > >> To qualify for IPv6 PI address space, an organisation must: >> a) not be an LIR >> > > What is the rationale behind this? That LIRs do not need IPv6 PI address > space? > For as I read this, a LIR can never requeste for and receive an IPv6 PI > address space. Is this what is meant here? > > > With kind regards, > > > Andries Hettema > IP-Office KPN Internet > +31 70 45 13398 > ip-office at kpn.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net > [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Filiz Yilmaz > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 5:35 PM > To: policy-announce at ripe.net > Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published > (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations) > > PDP Number: 2006-01 > Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations > > Dear Colleagues, > > The text of the policy proposal 2006-01 has been revised based on > the community feedback. We have published the new version (version > 5.0) today. The draft document for the proposal has also been published > as well as the impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html > > and the draft document at: > > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-421-draft2006-01-v5.html > > We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 9 March 2009. > > Regards > > Filiz Yilmaz > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ______________ > This inbound message to KPN has been checked for all known viruses by > KPN MailScan, > powered by MessageLabs. > For further information visit: http://www.kpn.com, keyword 'Mailscan' > ________________________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090210/40d4c08e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]