[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Lutz Donnerhacke lutz at iks-jena.de
Wed Dec 2 09:43:13 CET 2009
* Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > No no no no. I do NOT want to duplicate the IPv4 table into IPv6 by doing > that. I'd rather have a single /24 route per ASN for 6RD than multiple > routes per ASN into 2002::/16. Those people deploying 6rd are the only people which will announce more specifics. OTOH the discussion here raises a similar concern about 6rd address policy: "I do NOT want to duplicate the LIR table into IPv6 /24 allocations and announcements, especially if they are going to traffic engineer those further." > Also, the problem 6RD tries to solve won't be solved if I filter to only > 2002::/16 and don't accept more specifics. Which problem addresses 6rd? Using 6to4 technology to avoid deployment costs without fixing the broken anycast routers?