[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Lutz Donnerhacke lutz at iks-jena.de
Tue Dec 1 15:58:44 CET 2009
* Florian Frotzler wrote: > That's really funny, you explicitly mention "waste of address space" > in your draft, trying to bash on the 6RD draft. You propagate waste of > router memory and all the other funny stuff caused by large routing > tables, which is really much better than handing out more bits to the > LIRs. Going personal in the discussion is not a recommended rethorical method. With an anycast fallback an router operator can safely remove more specific routing entries which are too far away. The problem is to fix the broken routers, not to throw away a whole /16.