[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.1
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Thu Aug 27 15:22:17 CEST 2009
>> I was thinking about making sure that new companies can have >> a few IPv4 addresses to be able to talk to the IPv4-only >> world. If we do that, then nobody can complain. If they think >> they don't have enough addresses, well, so has the rest of >> the world. If they can't get any IPv4 addresses at all this >> might be perceived as unfair or anti-competitive. > > Fair enough. However this could be solved by the market if > some ISPs offer v4-to-v6 gateway services to customers whose > networks are pure v6. That would mean that a new ISP can only enter the market when buying a service from an existing ISP. I don't know if this would be seen as anti-competitive, but I suspect it will. Especially because we could make policy that prevents (well, significantly postpones) that situation. - Sander PS: I make the assumption here that not everything will be reachable over native IPv6 when the new company wants to start. I think this is a reasonable assumption for the first years at least.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]