[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] general meetings
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Schachtner
Andreas at Schachtner.eu
Tue Aug 25 15:29:36 CEST 2009
Hi, ... > This is important, because if the period of time is short enough, we > could ask all LIRs to tell RIPE what their IP address requirements > are month by month. Then RIPE can see how much the inventory is > oversubscribed, and allocate the entire inventory at one time, dividing > it up so that everyone runs out at the same time. > > Why do this? So that we help ISPs who are providing IPv6 Internet access > to get market penetration for their services by creating yet another > media event. A scheme like a) allocate one fixed block size, or b) > starve > everyone equally, will result in everyone running out at different > times. > This makes it harder to get the attention of the market and sell IPv6 > services in sufficient volume. Two remarks on this: {this is more a formal one] (1) in a previous poll from Sander, we'd a large majority of comments against bundling IPv4 use with IPv6 (deployment). This looks like getting in through the backdoor. (2) changing run-rates will render your approach useless. And it is very likely, that run-rates will change at the end of life cycle. Regards, Andreas -- -- Andreas Schachtner afs Holding GmbH communication technologies & solutions http://afs-com.de/ Geschaeftsfuehrer Andreas Schachtner HRB 15448, Amtsgericht Dortmund -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090825/9a167e82/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] general meetings
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]