[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jerzy Pawlus
Jerzy.Pawlus at cyf-kr.edu.pl
Wed Apr 15 12:19:02 CEST 2009
Sascha Lenz writes: > I don't really support the proposal eiter since it's rather a workaround > for the "i-can-only-annonce-a-/32-to-certain-parties"-problem mentioned > earlier in the thread. > I do recognize the problem though, hust hopeing someone comes up with a > nicer solution to this. > Time is running faster and faster. Perhaps we can put a time limit to "Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs" Jurek
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]