[address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)

Greetings!

First I do not like the /27 minimum allocation and assignment. I do not 
belive that people will adapt their filtering policies for this single /8.

And I do not belive in RFC5211 at all. Here in the Czech Republic I know 
about some ISPs which just stopped all IPv6 deployment activites 
probably due to crisis-related budget cuts. So I do not like any policy 
which gives existing ISPs a chance to obtain some addresses from the 
last /8. In my opinion they have plenty of time to deploy IPv6 
transition mechanisms and are able to obtain addresses for NAT(-PT|...) 
under current policies before the End. I would rather reserve the last 
/8 purely for newcomers and I would set some maximum allocation and 
assignment boundary in order to make sure that it will sustain for at 
least X newcomers which are expected to come in Y years.

I do not try to argue that this is more "fair" than the 2009-04 and I do 
not want to punish existing ISPs. I just want to support more newcomers 
instead of handing out some portion of the last /8 to companies which 
have (in case of LIRs) at least /21 and are likely able to pick 
addresses for IPv6 transition mechanisms from their old allocations.

Best regards,
Tomas

Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
> PDP Number: 2009-04
> IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment
>   
-- 
Tomáš Hlaváček <tomas.hlavacek at elfove.cz>