This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ondřej Surý
ondrej.sury at nic.cz
Wed Oct 29 08:09:18 CET 2008
2008/10/29 Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at marcoh.net>: > > On Oct 29, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:48:06AM +0100, >> Ond??ej Surý <ondrej.sury at nic.cz> wrote >> a message of 9 lines which said: >> >>> We would like to see policy for IPv4 and IPv6 modifiedto allow /24 >>> *minimum* for IPv4 and /48 *minimum* togTLD/ccTLD. First reason >>> behind this is that one PI is not reallyenough and it's blocking us >>> to deploy more DNS serversand make our TLD service more reliable. >> >> As a TLD, I agree. ".fr" has currently two anycast nodes (managed >> outside, so they do not use "our" addresses) and plan to add more and >> to manage them ourselves. We will therefore need more than one PI prefix. > > Maybe I understand, maybe I don't...but isn't the whole idea of anycast that > you create redundancy by adding more machines/locations in the same address > space ? So what exactly are you trying to gain by adding multiple anycast > blocks, that's not exactly clear with me. We discussed this face to face, but just for the record. Idea of having multiple PI anycast clouds is to have: M servers in N anycast clouds and L locations and each anycast cloud includes K servers, where L >= N, M >= L and K << M Picture would be better here :(. Very simple example in plain words: each anycast cloud will have 3 servers placed in 3 different location, and each two anycast clouds can share no more then 2 locations with another anycast cloud. Each location cannot hold more then two anycast clouds. Anycast clouds: A1 A2 A3 A4 Locations: L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 A1(L1 L2 L3) A2(L1 L4 L5) A3(L2 L4 L6) A4(L3 L5 L6) That way any two locations can fail without failure of any anycast node. Ondrej. -- Ondřej Surý technický ředitel/Chief Technical Officer ----------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- .cz domain registry Americká 23,120 00 Praha 2,Czech Republic mailto:ondrej.sury at nic.cz http://nic.cz/ sip:ondrej.sury at nic.cz tel:+420.222745110 mob:+420.739013699 fax:+420.222745112 -----------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]