[address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Thu Oct 23 21:30:10 CEST 2008
Marco, On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 17:41 +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > >> Let's keep things simple please! > > > > Indeed, but I guess you would not recommend to "simply" change a > > formally adopted policy document, would you? This could be seen as > > a nasty precedent... > > > You have a point there and it we might call it an oversight in the PDP > to not be able to handle small changes in formatting or typos without > going through the whole process again. So for the sake of it all, > let's adopt this change using the current proces and focus the > discussion on how to handle such changes in the future. I don't expect > it to happen much, but the way you put it a small cosmetic error can > result in going over a lenghty discussion again and might be a tool to > bend things differently by the need to reach consensus again. I agree. Right now there *is* no other way to change policies, right? I found Thomas' comment a bit strange - like asking the IETF to create a standard without an Internet draft. But he does have a point that the PDP may be heavyweight in cases like this. So you are right, lets tweak the PDP. :) Cheers, -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]