[address-policy-wg] 2008-07 New Policy Proposal (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 New Policy Proposal (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 New Policy Proposal (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
internetplumber at gmail.com
Wed Oct 15 21:13:19 CEST 2008
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-07.html I'm not entirely sure this is a can of worms that I want to open (in fact, I'm sure I don't), but I guess it will be a question that someone has to ask sooner or later... Given that some (I do not know what figure that is) of the historical address space will have been allocated to customers of LIRs ("sites") rather than LIRs themselves, are they to be considered within this at all? I.e. "assignments" as well as "allocations." As it is currently worded, I guess not, is this because it is not worth it? Or too hard? Cheers, Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 New Policy Proposal (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 New Policy Proposal (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]