[address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-08 will go to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ondřej Surý
ondrej.sury at nic.cz
Mon Nov 17 17:35:48 CET 2008
Brett, I already sent my proposals to modify ipv4 and ipv6 policies to wg chairs while in Dubai. But incorporating ENUM should be as easy as listing ENUM Tier-1 registry to list of what is 'Critical Infrastructure'. Ondrej. 2008/11/17 B C <brettlists at gmail.com>: > Ondrej, > in the light of the comments on my proposal for ENUM anycast > assignments discussed in Dubai, I was planning to write a revised policy > proposal to go through PDP, I will be taking action on this as soon as the > minutes/webcast from Dubai are available. I think it's safe to say we are > working towards the same/similar goal and I think it's important that we > don't both do the same work. I will have a first draft of my proposal here > in the next couple of weeks. > > Regards > > Brett Carr > > Nominet UK > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury at nic.cz> wrote: >> >> Hello everybody, >> >> I would like to post unformal proposal before writing >> official policy modification proposal (and/or having >> discussion tomorrow on Open Hour). >> >> We would like to see policy for IPv4 and IPv6 modified >> to allow /24 *minimum* for IPv4 and /48 *minimum* to >> gTLD/ccTLD. >> >> First reason behind this is that one PI is not really >> enough and it's blocking us to deploy more DNS servers >> and make our TLD service more reliable. >> >> Second reason is that if we deploy more Anycasted DNS >> servers we could keep (or drop down) number of NS records >> for TLD, so we could manage to keep DNS reply size low >> even with DNSSEC. >> >> And last, but not least, it would be good to keep this >> synchronized with other regions (see [1],[2]). Note: >> we may also extend the list of requestors to: >> Root DNS, ccTLD, gTLD, IANA, RIRs. >> Which I think is reasonable list. >> >> 1. http://www.nro.net/documents/comp-pol.html#2-4-2 >> 2. http://www.nro.net/documents/comp-pol.html#3-4-1 >> >> If there is at least some consensus, I am willing to >> write official policy change proposal. >> >> Ondrej >> -- >> Ondřej Surý >> technický ředitel/Chief Technical Officer >> ----------------------------------------- >> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- .cz domain registry >> Americká 23,120 00 Praha 2,Czech Republic >> mailto:ondrej.sury at nic.cz http://nic.cz/ >> sip:ondrej.sury at nic.cz tel:+420.222745110 >> mob:+420.739013699 fax:+420.222745112 >> ----------------------------------------- > > -- Ondřej Surý technický ředitel/Chief Technical Officer ----------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- .cz domain registry Americká 23,120 00 Praha 2,Czech Republic mailto:ondrej.sury at nic.cz http://nic.cz/ sip:ondrej.sury at nic.cz tel:+420.222745110 mob:+420.739013699 fax:+420.222745112 -----------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-08 will go to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]