This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 review phase comments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Thu May 15 14:27:01 CEST 2008
On 28 apr 2008, at 15:20, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> With the acceptance of this proposal RIPE NCC will run a one-time >> operation to allocate an IPv6 block to every LIR that does not have >> any >> existing IPv6 holdings. > > Under current IPv6 allocation policies, I understand that the > allocation process goes like this: > > lir: please give me a /32; i intend to assign IPv6 addresses. > > ripe ncc: here you go. > > In this light, 2008-02 is a very odd solution to a problem which - > as far as I can tell - doesn't exist. But I might be tempted to > support it if the RIPE NCC were to hand out a free packet of > Smarties with every /32. Following up on last week`s meeting, it seems that the current idea is to just tell the LIR's to go to ripe and request IPv6, which isn't a real policy change and more of a marketing effort. If this is the case, I don't think this belongs in this WG and probably should be moved to NCC-services-wg, any thoughts on that one ? Groet, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 review phase comments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]