[off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Wed Mar 26 09:35:27 CET 2008
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:27:41AM +0100, Pim van Pelt wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:39:51AM +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > | "we" in this case is me and the mouse in my pocket. > | and yes, this is tossing the /64 stricture. the house > | network is nicely tucked into a /112 - although we advertize > | a /48 covering prefix so it will get transit. > good for you, bill. you get to do things different just because you can AND the > world gets to see you adhere to what we collectively regard as good practice. > > I don't think I have your /48 in my routing tables. Sorry it didn't work out. got a target v6 address for me to reach? --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]