[off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:27:41AM +0100, Pim van Pelt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:39:51AM +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> | 	"we" in this case is me and the mouse in my pocket.
> | 	and yes, this is tossing the /64 stricture.  the house
> | 	network is nicely tucked into a /112 - although we advertize
> | 	a /48 covering prefix so it will get transit.  
> good for you, bill. you get to do things different just because you can AND the
> world gets to see you adhere to what we collectively regard as good practice.
> 
> I don't think I have your /48 in my routing tables. Sorry it didn't work out.

	got a target v6 address for me to reach?

--bill