[BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Thu Mar 20 14:04:00 CET 2008
michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > Any market for IPv4 addresses will only exist for a short time, and high > prices which would justify this type of sale will exist for an even > shorter time. It is just not that expensive to transition to IPv6. Most > of the cost nowadays, lies in development of a fully transparent > IPv4-IPv6 Internet access service. That work is now being done openly by > many companies, and when the IPv4 shortage starts to be felt, most > companies will be in a position to roll out IPv6 without excessive > costs. > I share your opinions on the likely length of existence for this market, which is why I see no great harm in the proposal and even less likelihood of governments and regulators getting involved. The intention is provide a short period of IPv4 fluidity to ease transition to IPv6. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]