[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lutz Donnerhacke
lutz at iks-jena.de
Thu Mar 20 08:51:24 CET 2008
* Pekka Savola wrote: > I don't think the current allocation criteria for /32 are prohibitive > for ISPs. I'd like to hear feedback on experiences to the countrary. > As a result, it's not obvious which problem this is trying to solve The current procedere is not prohibitive, but requires an extra effort and mostly LIR internal approvments from the financial and legal departments as well as interaction with the company leaders directly. Technicans who want to play with or deploy IPv6 are asked: a) is this really necessary, b) who will be responsibile, c) what's the bussiness case and d) where is the ROI timetable. 2008-2 reverses the situation for the technical department.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]