[BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Mar 19 19:03:58 CET 2008
michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: >> One thing I'm not sure about is this: >> >> LIRs that receive a re-allocation from another LIR cannot >> re-allocate complete or partial blocks of the same address space >> to another LIR within 24 months of receiving the re-allocation. >> > > Interesting. Since this policy seems to be saying that it will be > legitimate for LIRs to trade addresse blocks, has anyone investigated > whether or not restrictions, such as those above, would be considered > illegal restraint of trade? > Ultimate acceptance of any policy rests with the RIPE NCC board, who would be consulting counsel on this one, I suspect. Since no one on this list is a lawyer, could we avoid uninformed legal speculation? Of course *if* there is a lawyer reading this list, feel free to give us the benefit of your opinions Nigel Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]